On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > >>> And perhaps associated PIDs? > >> > >> Yeah, that can be useful, if others also feel like it is important, I can > >> look into preparing a patch for the same. > > > > Thanks. > > Thom, what do you think the EXPLAIN output should look like, > specifically? Or anyone else who feels like answering. > > I don't think it would be very useful to repeat the entire EXPLAIN > output n times, once per worker. That sounds like a loser. >
Yes, it doesn't seem good idea to repeat the information, but what about the cases when different workers perform scan on different relations (partitions in case of Append node) or may be performs a different operation in Sort or join node parallelism. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
