On 2015-10-30 09:48:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Hmm. ProcessInterrupts() signals some FATAL errors while the
> > connection is idle, and rumor has it that that works: the client
> > doesn't immediately read the FATAL error, but the next time it sends a
> > query, it tries to read from the connection and sees the FATAL error
> > at that time. I wonder why that's not working here.
>
> A likely theory is that the kernel is reporting failure to libpq's
> send() because the other side of the connection is already gone.
> This would be timing-dependent of course.
Looking at a strace psql over unix socket is actually receiving the
error message:
recvfrom(3, "E\0\0\0lSFATAL\0C57P01\0Mterminating "..., 16384, 0, NULL, NULL) =
109
but psql does print:
server closed the connection unexpectedly
it happens to work over localhost:
FATAL: 57P01: terminating connection due to unexpected postmaster exit
LOCATION: secure_read, be-secure.c:170
server closed the connection unexpectedly
This probably means the server terminated abnormally
before or while processing the request.
the problem seems to be the loop eating all the remaining input:
void
pqHandleSendFailure(PGconn *conn)
{
/*
* Accept any available input data, ignoring errors. Note that if
* pqReadData decides the backend has closed the channel, it will close
* our side of the socket --- that's just what we want here.
*/
while (pqReadData(conn) > 0)
/* loop until no more data readable */ ;
after the first pqReadData() there's no remaining input and thus the
second call to pqReadData()'s pqsecure_read reads 0 and this is hit:
/*
* OK, we are getting a zero read even though select() says ready. This
* means the connection has been closed. Cope.
*/
definitelyEOF:
printfPQExpBuffer(&conn->errorMessage,
libpq_gettext(
"server closed
the connection unexpectedly\n"
"\tThis probably means the server terminated
abnormally\n"
"\tbefore or while
processing the request.\n"));
adding a parseInput(conn) into the loop yields the expected
FATAL: 57P01: terminating connection due to unexpected postmaster exit
Is there really any reason not to do that?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
