On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > I am not denying from that fact, the point I wanted to convey here is
that
> > the logic guarded by "params != estate->paramLI" in plpgsql_param_fetch
> > is only needed if cursors are in use otherwise we won't need them even
> > for parallel query.
>
> Well, I think what Noah and are trying to explain is that this is not
> true.  The problem is that, even if there are no cursors anywhere in
> the picture, there might be some variable in the param list that is
> not used by the parallel query but which, if evaluated, leads to an
> error.
>

I understand what Noah wants to say, it's just that I am not able to see
how that is possible by looking at current code.  The code is not straight
forward in this area, so there is a good chance that I might be missing
something.


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Reply via email to