On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not denying from that fact, the point I wanted to convey here is that > the logic guarded by "params != estate->paramLI" in plpgsql_param_fetch > is only needed if cursors are in use otherwise we won't need them even > for parallel query.
Well, I think what Noah and are trying to explain is that this is not true. The problem is that, even if there are no cursors anywhere in the picture, there might be some variable in the param list that is not used by the parallel query but which, if evaluated, leads to an error. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
