On 10/11/2015 02:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Amir Rohan <amir.ro...@zoho.com> wrote: >> On 10/10/2015 04:32 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I was arguing that it's an on-going task that would do >> better if it had a TODO list, instead of "ideas for tests" >> being scattered across 50-100 messages spanning a year or >> more in one thread or another. You may disagree. > > Let's be clear. I am fully in line with your point. >
I apologize -- that didn't came out right. What I meant to suggest was "open an issue" to track any works that needs to be done. But I guess that's not the PG way. Amir -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
