Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 2015-09-29 13:44, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> ><alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >-#define RecoveryRequiresBoolParameter(param_name, currValue, masterValue) \
> >-do { \
> >- bool _currValue = (currValue); \
> >- bool _masterValue = (masterValue); \
> >- if (_currValue != _masterValue) \
> >- ereport(ERROR, \
> >- (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), \
> >- errmsg("hot standby is not possible because it
> >requires \"%s\" to be same on master and standby (master has \"%s\",
> >standby has \"%s\")", \
> >- param_name, \
> >- _masterValue ? "true" : "false", \
> >- _currValue ? "true" : "false"))); \
> >-} while(0)
> >
> >This code should not be deleted because there is still the caller of
> >the macro function.
>
> Looks like Alvaro didn't merge the second patch correctly, the only caller
> should have been removed as well.
filterdiff loses hunks once in a while, which is why I stopped using it
quite some time ago :-( I eyeballed its output to ensure it hadn't
dropped any hunk, but apparently I missed that one.
I guess I should file a bug report.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
