On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 2015-09-02 16:14, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> >On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>track_commit_timestamp tracks COMMIT PREPARED as expected in standby
>> >>>server,
>> >>>but not in master server. Is this intentional? It should track COMMIT
>> >>>PREPARED
>> >>>even in master? Otherwise, we cannot use commit_timestamp feature to check
>> >>>the replication lag properly while we use 2PC.
>> >>
>> >>That sounds like it must be a bug. I think you should add it to the
>> >>open items list.
>>
>> Attached fixes this. It includes advancement of replication origin as well.
>> I didn't feel like doing refactor of commit code this late in 9.5 cycle
>> though, so I went with the code duplication + note in xact.c.
>
> Thanks, your proposed behavior looks reasonable. I didn't like the
> existing coding nor the fact that with your patch we'd have two copies
> of it, so I changed a bit instead to be more understandable. Hopefully I
> didn't break too many things. This patch includes the patch for the
> other commitTS open item too.
-#define RecoveryRequiresBoolParameter(param_name, currValue, masterValue) \
-do { \
- bool _currValue = (currValue); \
- bool _masterValue = (masterValue); \
- if (_currValue != _masterValue) \
- ereport(ERROR, \
- (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), \
- errmsg("hot standby is not possible because it
requires \"%s\" to be same on master and standby (master has \"%s\",
standby has \"%s\")", \
- param_name, \
- _masterValue ? "true" : "false", \
- _currValue ? "true" : "false"))); \
-} while(0)
This code should not be deleted because there is still the caller of
the macro function.
@@ -5321,7 +5333,7 @@ xact_redo_commit(xl_xact_parsed_commit *parsed,
/* Set the transaction commit timestamp and metadata */
TransactionTreeSetCommitTsData(xid, parsed->nsubxacts, parsed->subxacts,
commit_time, origin_id,
- false);
+ false, true);
Why does xact_redo_commit always set replaying_xlog and write_xlog to
false and true, respectively? ISTM that they should be opposite...
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
