On 2015-09-16 19:46:10 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > > > @@ -91,8 +92,38 @@ CREATE EXTENSION [ IF NOT EXISTS ] <replaceable > > > class="parameter">extension_name > > > The name of the schema in which to install the extension's > > > objects, given that the extension allows its contents to be > > > relocated. The named schema must already exist. > > > - If not specified, and the extension's control file does not > > > specify a > > > - schema either, the current default object creation schema is > > > used. > > > + If not specified, and the extension control file does not define > > > + <literal>schema</> either, the current default object creation > > > + schema is used. > > > + </para> > > > > Imo still a spurious change. > > I think some more work is needed in this file -- ISTM the rules used to > determine the creation schema under CASCADE should not be placed within > the SCHEMA clause explanation.
Hm. Why not? Seems to make sense in the context of that page? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
