2015-09-10 2:47 GMT+02:00 David Fetter <da...@fetter.org>: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:32:10AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2015-09-09 18:27:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, dinesh kumar <dineshkuma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Sure, it’s a clear fact that, we can implement this function > > > > with RAISE statements. > > > > > > Given that, I suggest we just forget the whole thing. > > > > I'm not convinced. Sure, it's easy, but I by now have written the > > respective function dozens of times. Why should we force that on > > everyone? > > +20 or so here, that being the number of times I recall offhand having > written the function. >
I have same opinion - it is pretty often used function. Pavel > > Cheers, > David. > -- > David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter > Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com > > Remember to vote! > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
