On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:32:10AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-09-09 18:27:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, dinesh kumar <dineshkuma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Sure, it’s a clear fact that, we can implement this function > > > with RAISE statements. > > > > Given that, I suggest we just forget the whole thing. > > I'm not convinced. Sure, it's easy, but I by now have written the > respective function dozens of times. Why should we force that on > everyone?
+20 or so here, that being the number of times I recall offhand having written the function. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
