On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i.kurbangal...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> > Ildus, could you please review Amit & Robert's patch? >> [1] - >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/caa4ek1kdec1tm5ya9gkv85vtn4qqsrxzkjru-tu70g_tl1x...@mail.gmail.com > About [1] and [2]. They are slightly conflicting, but if [1] is > going to be committed I can easily use it in [2]. And it will simplify > my patch, so I have no objections here. And the same time [3] can be > significantly simplified and improved on top of [1] and [2].
Great - let's try to deal with [1] first, then. Does anyone wish to object to me committing that part? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
