On 9 July 2015 at 21:10, Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I see that patch of Robert and Amit adds current lock type > into PgBackendStatus and, in turn, adds it into pg_stat_activity. This is > small part of what you implement in waits monitoring patch. Dividing big > features into small pieces makes it much easier to include PostgreSQL. I > think you should join work of Robert and Amit in inclusion current lock > type into PgBackendStatus. There are things you could help them to improve. > And then you can rebase waits monitoring patch according to it. > I see the need for both current wait information and for cumulative historical detail. I'm willing to wait before reviewing this, but not for more than 1 more CF. Andres, please decide whether we should punt to next CF now, based upon other developments. Thanks -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
