>> One lesson from XL we got is that we need testing framework for cluster, >> so any cluster project should at least pass functional and performance >> testing. >> > > +1. In early XC days, we focused a lot on adding newer features and > supporting as many PG features as possible. That took its toll on the > testing and QA. It was a mistake though my feeling was we tried to correct > that to some extend with XL. We did a 9.5 merge, which of course was a big > deal, but other than more time is being spent on improving stability and > performance
Agreed. Any cluster project needs a cluster testing framework. pgpool-II project runs "build farm" which runs cluster regression tests every day. The tests includes several versions of pgpool-II and PostgreSQL combinations using docker. Still it needs more tests but even with limited test cases, it is pretty usefull to detect bugs. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
