On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > One lesson from XL we got is that we need testing framework for cluster, > so any cluster project should at least pass functional and performance > testing. > +1. In early XC days, we focused a lot on adding newer features and supporting as many PG features as possible. That took its toll on the testing and QA. It was a mistake though my feeling was we tried to correct that to some extend with XL. We did a 9.5 merge, which of course was a big deal, but other than more time is being spent on improving stability and performance XL was very easy to break and I'm wondering how many corner cases still > exists. > Your team reported 2 or 3 major issues which I think we were able to fix quite quickly. But if there are more such issues which your team has recorded somewhere, I would request you to send them to the XL mailing list. I would definitely want to look at them and address them. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
