Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > I'm ok with that too, although I do like the warning at configure > time. I'd go with the template approach due to that, but I don't feel > strongly about it.
Meh. I did *not* like the way you proposed doing that: it looked far too dependent on autoconf internals (the kind that they change regularly). If you can think of a way of emitting a warning that isn't going to break in a future autoconf release, then ok. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers