On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2015-06-19 11:16:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> I wonder whether it's such a good idea for the postmaster to give >>>> up waiting before all children are gone (postmaster.c:1722 in HEAD). > >>> I doubt it. > >> Seconded. It's pretty bad to possibly not be able to start again after >> stopping it. I don't see the benefit in not waiting - sure, the >> poastmaster exits faster, but postgres hasn't shut down at that point... > > Yeah. I'll see about fixing this. Hard to be sure if it will fix > hamster's issue though.
I have re-enabled the TAP tests in hamster. What happens in the next couple of days will be interesting to see. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
