On 2015-06-10 08:24:23 -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > That doesn't look right to me. Why is this code logging a standby > > snapshot for physical slots? > > > > This is the new function I referred to above. The logging of the snapshot > is in 'not RecoveryInProgress()' case, meaning it's running in primary and > not in a standby.
It's still done uselessly for physical slots? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
