On 06/01/2015 03:22 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > On 06/01/15 23:47, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 06/01/2015 02:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> Anybody else want to speak for or against back-patching the patch as >>> posted? I intentionally didn't push it in before today's releases, >>> but I will push it later this week if there are not objections. >> >> I would like Mark Wong to test this on DBT3, if that's possible for him. >> I'm very worried about an unanticipated regression. > > AFAIK Mark is busy with other stuff at the moment, but I can do the > TPC-H (which DBT3 is equal to, IIRC).
Yeah, I just want something which has a chance of catching unanticipated regression in queries which should be unaffected by the patch. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
