On 5 Dec 2002 at 15:36, Tom Lane wrote: > "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> You can do that now. > >> ALTER TABLE <table> ADD CONSTRAINT <const> FOREIGN KEY .... > > > That I know. That syntax is radically different from that proposed. > > So you're proposing we replace a SQL-spec-compliant syntax with one > that is not? Why?
If it's not compliant, I withdraw. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
