On 01/23/2015 03:00 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why is the "last;" still there? AFAICS it matters in the old coding because of the while, but I don't think there is an equivalent looping construct in the new code.
You're right, I missed that. It shouldn't be there, and will produce an error like
Can't "last" outside a loop block cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
