On 3 September 2014 01:08, Jan Wieck <j...@wi3ck.info> wrote: > On 09/02/2014 06:56 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> People are free to do what they want, but to my mind that would be a >> massive waste of resources, and probably imposing a substantial extra >> maintenance burden on the core committers. >> > > I hear you and agree to some degree. > > But at the same time I remember that one of the strengths of Postgres used > to be to be able to incorporate "new" ideas. > > This seems to be one of those cases. > > Instead of "fork" plpgsql2, what about designing a completely new > PL/postgres from scratch? It will only take 3-10 years, but I bet it will > be worth it after all. And I mean that. No sarcasm. > > And how it would be better then already existing plperl/plpython?
- Szymon
