Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> There are several possible methods of doing that, but I think the best
> one is just to leave the SQL-callable C functions in fuzzystrmatch and
> move only the underlying code that supports into core.
I hadn't been paying close attention to this thread, but I'd just assumed
that that would be the approach.
It might be worth introducing new differently-named pg_proc entries for
the same functions in core, but only if we can agree that there are better
names for them than what the extension uses.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
