At 2014-07-02 16:47:16 -0400, alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: > > If we expect that the author is going to update the patch, the right > state to use is "Waiting on author".
Quite so. That's how I understand it, and what I've been doing. But what if we really *don't* expect the author to update the patch, but they do it anyway? That's the only case I was referring to. If the right thing to do is to open an entry in the next CF (as you said earlier in your mail), that's all right with me. -- Abhijit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
