On 2014-06-17 11:22:17 +0200, Vik Fearing wrote: > On 06/17/2014 09:43 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > On 06/14/2014 09:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> > As I mentioned awhile ago, I'm thinking about implementing the > >> > SQL-standard construct > >> > > >> > UPDATE foo SET ..., (a,b,...) = (SELECT x,y,...), ... > >> > > >> > I've run into a rather nasty problem, which is how does this interact > >> > with expansion of NEW references in ON UPDATE rules? > > > > Was'nt there a plan (consensus?) about deprecating rules altogether ? > > I believe that was just for user access to them, ie CREATE RULE. I > don't think there was ever question of purging them from the code base.
I don't think any such concensus has been made? I wish it were, but the last discussions about it imo ended quite differently. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
