On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-06-02 22:59:55 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> You're concerned about the scenario using pg_upgrade? I'm not sure the >> >> detail >> >> of pg_upgrade. But if it doesn't work properly, we should have gotten >> >> the trouble >> > >> > I'm not worried about pg_upgrade, because by design pg_stat_statements >> > will discard stats files that originated in earlier versions. However, >> > I don't see a need to change pg_stat_statements to serialize its >> > statistics to disk in the pg_stat directory before we branch off 9.4. >> > As you mentioned, it's harmless. >> >> Yeah, that's an idea. OTOH, there is no *strong* reason to postpone >> the fix to 9.5. So I just feel inclined to apply the fix now... > > +1 for fixing it now. +1. A beta is here for that as well. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
