On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Tomas Vondra <t...@fuzzy.cz> wrote: > On 28.5.2014 19:52, Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> But pg_stat_statements file is saved under $PGDATA/global yet. >>>> Is this intentional or just oversight? >>> >>> >>> I think it's an oversight. >> >> OK, patch attached. >> >> I'm afraid that it's not okay to change the file layout in $PGDATA at this >> beta1 >> stage because that change basically seems to need initdb. Otherwise something >> like "no such file or directory" error can happen. But in this case what we >> need >> to change is only the location of the pg_stat_statements permanent stats >> file. >> So, without initdb, the server will not be able to find the >> pg_stat_statements stats >> file, but this is not so harmful. Only the problem is that the >> pg_stat_statements >> stats which were collected in past would disappear. OTOH, the server can keep >> running successfully from then and no critical data will not >> disappear. Therefore >> I think we can commit this patch even at beta1. Thought? > > For HEAD, probably yes. But what about backpatching 9.3?
I think No. So we should not backpatch this to 9.3. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
