On 07/05/14 20:37, Robert Haas wrote:
At a minimum, it's got to be better than the status quo, where shared memory is accessible throughout the entire lifetime of non-shmem-access background workers.
Seems reasonable to me, it might need to be revisited to at least try to figure out if we can make EXEC_BACKEND safer, but it's definitely better than the current state.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
