On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I've complained about this problem a few times before: there's nothing >> to prevent a background worker which doesn't request shared memory >> access from calling InitProcess() and then accessing shared memory >> anyway. The attached patch is a first crack at fixing it. > >> Comments? > > Looks reasonable to me.
Thanks for the fast review. Committed, after fixing one further bug I spotted. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
