On 6.5.2014 22:24, Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra <t...@fuzzy.cz> writes: >> I recall there was a call for more animals with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS >> some time ago, so I went and enabled that on all three animals. Let's >> see how long that will take. > >> I see there are more 'clobber' options in the code: CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY >> and CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY. Would that be a good idea to enable these >> as well? > >> The time requirements will be much higher (especially for the >> RECURSIVELY option), but running that once a week shouldn't be a big >> deal - the machine is pretty much dedicated to the buildfarm. > > I've never had the patience to run the regression tests to completion > with CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY at all, let alone do it on a regular > basis. (I wonder if there's some easy way to run it for just a few > regression tests...)
Now, that's a challenge ;-) > > I think testing CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY would be sensible though. OK, I've enabled this for now. Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
