On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:04:01PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > There's pretty little coverage of non mainstream platforms/compilers in > the buildfarm atm. Maybe we should send an email on -announce asking for > new ones? > There's no coverage for OS-wise; > * AIX (at all) > * HP-UX (for master at least) > (* Tru64) > (* UnixWare) > > Architecture wise there's no coverage for: > * some ARM architecture varians > * mips > * s390/x > * sparc 32bit > (* s390) > (* alpha) > (* mipsel) > (* M68K) > > A couple of those aren't that important (my opinion indicated by ()), > but the other ones really should be covered or desupported.
More coverage of non-gcc compilers would be an asset to the buildfarm. +1 for sending a call for help to -announce. I agree with your importance estimates, particularly on the OS side. -1 for making code-level changes to "desupport" a platform based on the lack of a buildfarm member, though I don't mind documentation/advocacy changes on that basis. -- Noah Misch EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
