On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: >> Thanks for your a lot of comments. I revised the patch according to >> comments from Robert Haas and Marti Raudsepp. > > I have started looking into this patch and below are my > initial findings: > > 1. Dependency is not recorded when to_regclass is used, > however it is recorded when ::regclass is used. Below is > test to demonstrate this point. This change in behaviour is > neither discussed nor mentioned in docs along with patch.
I think this is expected as per current design, because for functions, it will create dependency on function (funcid), but not on it's argument values. So I think for this behaviour, we might need to mention in docs that to_regclass() and other newly added functions will behave differently for creation of dependencies. Anyone has any objection for this behaviour difference between usage of ::regclass and to_regclass()? With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
