On 03/05/2014 09:26 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> > What _would_ be interesting is to move all the hstore code into core, >> > and have hstore contrib just call the hstore core parts. That way, you >> > have one copy of the code, it is shared with JSONB, but hstore remains >> > as an extension that you can change or remove later. > That seems like an approach possibly worth investigating. It's not > too different from what we did when we moved text search into core. > The basic idea seems to be that we want jsonb in core, and we expect > it to replace hstore, but we can't get just get rid of hstore because > it has too many users
Yes, please! This was the original approach that we talked about and everyone agreed to, and what Andrew has been trying to implement. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
