On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:26:13PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > >> It's not clear how much different it would be if we waited til 9.5 > >> either- do we anticipate a lot of code changes beyond the copy/paste for > >> these? > > > > What _would_ be interesting is to move all the hstore code into core, > > and have hstore contrib just call the hstore core parts. That way, you > > have one copy of the code, it is shared with JSONB, but hstore remains > > as an extension that you can change or remove later. > > That seems like an approach possibly worth investigating. It's not > too different from what we did when we moved text search into core. > The basic idea seems to be that we want jsonb in core, and we expect > it to replace hstore, but we can't get just get rid of hstore because > it has too many users.
Yes. It eliminates the problem of code duplication, but keeps hstore in contrib for flexibility and compatibility. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
