On 03/03/2014 05:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> Primary value is that in theory the hstore2 opclasses are available >> *now*, as opposed to a year from now. > > Well, yes, that's right. Although we cannot assume that VODKA will get > into 9.5 - it's a big project. Nor is it obvious to me that a > VODKA-ized set of operator classes would not bring with them exactly > the same dilemma as we now face vis-a-vis hstore code reuse and GIN > operator classes. So it seems reasonable to me to suppose that VODKA > should not influence our decision here. Please correct me if I'm > mistaken.
I would agree with you. Andrew was onsite with a client over the weekend, which is why you haven't heard from him on this thread. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers