On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 03/03/2014 04:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> I understand that there are ambitious plans for a VODKA-am that will >> support indexing operations on nested structures that are a lot more >> advanced than those enabled by the hstore operator classes included in >> these patches. However, surely these hstore operator classes have >> independent value, or represent incremental progress? > > Primary value is that in theory the hstore2 opclasses are available > *now*, as opposed to a year from now.
Well, yes, that's right. Although we cannot assume that VODKA will get into 9.5 - it's a big project. Nor is it obvious to me that a VODKA-ized set of operator classes would not bring with them exactly the same dilemma as we now face vis-a-vis hstore code reuse and GIN operator classes. So it seems reasonable to me to suppose that VODKA should not influence our decision here. Please correct me if I'm mistaken. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
