On 1.3.2014 18:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for > Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: > 4. Total: 114. > > We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which > would be similar to the previous few commit fests. So decent job so > far.
I'm wondering what is the best way to select a patch to review. I mean, there are many patches with "needs review" (and often no reviewer) just one or two comments, but when I checked the email archives there's often a lot people discussing it. Do we have a list of patches that didn't get a proper review yet / badly need another one? What about improving the commitfest page by displaying a number of related e-mail messages / number of people involved? Shouldn't be difficult to get this from the mail archives ... regards Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
