Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-02-13 16:15:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Something like the attached? Can somebody who's seen this problem confirm
>> this improves matters?
> Hm. Won't that possiby lead to the fast tuple list growing unboundedly?
> I think we would need to at least need to stop using the fast tuple
> mechanism during gininsert() if it's already too big and do plain
> inserts.
No, because we've already got a process working on cleaning it out.
In any case, this needs some testing to see if it's an improvement
or not.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
