* Andres Freund (and...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > There's previously been talk about changing the limits to something more > reasonable but it got stalled in bikeshedding IIRC.
As I recall, there was argument that we didn't really need a new GUC for this (which was the proposal) but rather just need to pick a reasonable (small) value and hard-code it. Are there objections to doing so, or are there cases where that would be a serious problem? How do people feel about 4MB? Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature