On 2014-01-17 13:50:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > [ 0001-Add-support-for-printing-Size-arguments-to-elog-erep.patch ] > > I think this approach is fundamentally broken, because it can't reasonably > cope with any case more complicated than "%zu" or "%zd". While it's > arguable that we can get along without the ability to specify field width, > since the [U]INT64_FORMAT macros never allowed that, it is surely going > to be the case that translators will need to insert "n$" flags in the > translated versions of messages.
Am I just too tired, or am I not getting how INT64_FORMAT currently allows the arguments to be used posititional? Admittedly most places currently just cast down the value avoiding the need for INT64_FORMAT in many places. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
