Joe Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Uh, I thought you were changing connection_timeout, which is libpq and > > not a GUC parameter > > Yup, you're right -- I got myself confused. Sorry. > > > not statement_timeout. Do we want sub-second > > timeout values? Not sure. > > > > I found it surprising that the statement_timeout was not in units of seconds, > but that's only because I read the docs after I tried it instead of before. I > can't think of a reason to have sub-second values, but it's probably not worth > changing it at this point.
Most queries are sub-second in duration so it seemed logical to keep it the same as deadlock_timeout. I can see someone setting a 1/2 second delay for queries. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
