On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>  However, if the index is unique, wouldn't
> scanning the index produce data that actually satisfies the longer sort
> key?  It doesn't matter what the values of c,d are if there are no
> duplicates in the a,b columns.  So maybe as a separate patch, we could
> look at claiming that a unique index satisfies the entire query_pathkeys
> if it matches the first N columns of that.

That would be really spiffy.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to