On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-09-17 10:57:46 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu <sn...@uptime.jp> wrote:
>> > How about adding new system view with new function which returns
>> > a single pg_controldata value in text type, and using a cast for
>> > each column in the view definition?
>> >
>> > CREATE VIEW pg_catalog.pg_controldata AS
>> > SELECT pg_controldata('control_version')::integer AS control_version,
>> > pg_controldata('catalog_version')::integer AS catalog_version,
>> > pg_controldata('system_identifier')::bigint AS system_identifier,
>> > ...
>> > pg_controldata('next_xlog_file')::char(25) AS next_xlog_file,
>> > ...
>> > pg_controldata('encoding')::text AS encoding;
>> >
>> > Given that the view can work like a SRF, and it allows us to retrieve
>> > all the values of pg_controldata with appropriate types in single
>> > record from the view:
>>
>> I like this idea. I think having an easy way to get the values with
>> the right types will be a plus. But adding a separate function for
>> each field seems excessive, so I think this is a good compromise.
>
> Why not add a single function returning a composite type then? That'd at
> least have a chance of returning consistent values for the individual
> values that change during runtime. It would also produce proper errors
> when you load a view using columns that don't exist anymore instead of
> just at runtime.
Hmm. Yeah, that might be better.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
