On 08/26/2013 01:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > All the other variables are either already exposed, don't seem to be all > that interesting or not necessary accurate for a running cluster. > > I'd vote for doing things piecemal here, otherwise it seems to be too > likely that we never get anywhere.
Ok, that sounds like a vote to accept the pg_system_identifier patch, then. Given that the one thing I'd like to do is add to the docs on that patch, cautioning users that system_identifier doesn't mean what they think it means. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
