On 09/17/2013 02:46 PM, Rod Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com > <mailto:kgri...@ymail.com>> wrote: > > > Of course, that begs the question of whether == is already "taken". > If not, we could knock one '=' off of everything above except for > "equals". What existing uses are known for == ? > > > == is already taken as a common typo in plpgsql scripts. I strongly > prefer if this remained an error. > > IF foo == bar THEN ... That was also my reason for not suggesting == . It is too widely used in other systems for simple equality check.
-- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ
