On 09/16/2013 04:01 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Hannu Krosing <ha...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Lots of people were bitten when (undocumented) hash >> functions were changed thus breaking hash-based partitioning. > Nobody can be affected by the new operators in this patch unless > they choose to use them to compare two records. They don't work > for any other type and they don't come into play unless you > specifically request them. > Maybe the binary equality operator should be named ==== for "really deeply equal"
to distinguish it from === which would be merely NOT DISTINCT FROM we could even go one step further and define ===== to mean "the same". ? This could fit better in conceptual sequence of operator 'strength' -- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
