2013/8/20 David E. Wheeler <da...@justatheory.com> > On Aug 20, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > When you would to ignore result, then you should to use a PERFORM - > actually, it is limited now and should be fixed. Have no problem with it. > > Glad to have you on board. :-) > > > I don't would to enable a free unbound statement that returns result. > > I have no pony in that race. I think it is useful, though I prefer to unit > test things enough that I would be fine without it. > > But even without it, there may be times when I want to discard a result in > a function that *does* return a value -- likely a different value. So there > needs to be a way to distinguish statements that should return a value and > those that do not. >
can you show some examples, please Pavel > Best, > > David > >
