Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Would somebody object to making the rmgr's invo value #defines like:
> into enums?

I think that will create more problems than it fixes.  For one thing,
the same field is used to store values that would need to be multiple
independent enum types; and we also store additional bits into that
field.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to