On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:52:26AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Sorry for joining the thread this late, but I didn't really expect to see
> myself listed as a slacker on a public list.
>
> > Additionally, the following committers are not listed as reviewers on
> > any patch. Note that I have no way to search which ones might be
> > *committers* on a patch, so these folks are not necessarily slackers
>
> This means I'm a slacker because I'm not reviewing or committing a patch,
> right? Do we have a written rule somewhere? Or some other communication about
> this? I would have liked to know this requirement before getting singled out
> in
> public.
>
> Also I'd like to know who made the decision to require a patch review from
> each
> committer as I certainly missed it. Was the process public? Where can I find
> more about it? In general I find it difficult to digest that other people make
> decisions about my spare time without me having a word in the discussion.
I understand. You could wear "slacker" as a badge of honor: ;-)
http://momjian.us/main/img/main/slacker.jpg
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
