On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:10:11AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 06/24/2013 10:02 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> patch. The vast majority chose not to respond to my email to them at > >> all. When private email fails, the next step is public email. > > > > The only problem I have here is that I don't remember about deciding to > > publish a list of failures by public email at all. I hope it's not my > > memory failing me here, because then I would have to remember why I > > didn't speak up against that idea at the time. > > You didn't decide anything. As the CFM, I did. My job for this month > is to make sure that 100% of patches in that queue get reviewed and > either committed or bounced by July 15th. I'm doing my job.
+1 for trying the management practices you're trying. After the CF is closed, we can step back and treat ourselves to a nice debate about them. Thanks, nm -- Noah Misch EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
