Hackers, I'd like to take a straw poll here on how we should acknowledge reviewers. Please answer the below with your thoughts, either on-list or via private email.
How should reviewers get credited in the release notes? a) not at all b) in a single block titled "Reviewers for this version" at the bottom. c) on the patch they reviewed, for each patch Should there be a criteria for a "creditable" review? a) no, all reviews are worthwhile b) yes, they have to do more than "it compiles" c) yes, only code reviews should count Should reviewers for 9.4 get a "prize", such as a t-shirt, as a promotion to increase the number of non-submitter reviewers? a) yes b) no c) yes, but submitters and committers should get it too Thanks for your feedback! -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
